What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Structure?

· 3 min read
What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Structure?

If you've ever walked through a city and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.

The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can cause problems for people.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one Gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could result in a wide range of possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis and cataracts, and skin cancer.



Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower is around 400 meters away.  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further away you are from it.

While it sounds like a good idea, the reality is that those living close to towers might be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who lived farther away from the antennas.

But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.

safe distance from cell tower  is due to the fact that RF radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances.  https://zenwriting.net/poundwall3/how-far-can-you-move-from-the-5g-mobile-phone-tower-without-being-unsafe  is the largest organ in the human body. It is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.

Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.